Evidence mapPaperPMID 41345700Full record

SynthesisMolecular neurodegeneration2025

Diagnostic biomarkers for α-synucleinopathies- state of the art and future developments: a systematic review.

V Donadio, M Ingelsson, G Rizzo, A Furia, A Incensi, C Delprete, M Pinho, R Liguori, S Pritzkow

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

V Donadio *IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italia, UOC Clinica Neurologica, Bologna, Italy. vincenzo.donadio@unibo.it.
M Ingelsson *Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
G RizzoIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italia, UOC Clinica Neurologica, Bologna, Italy.
A FuriaIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italia, UOC Clinica Neurologica, Bologna, Italy.
A IncensiIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italia, UOC Clinica Neurologica, Bologna, Italy.
C DelpreteIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italia, UOC Clinica Neurologica, Bologna, Italy.
M PinhoDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Mcgovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
R Liguori *IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italia, UOC Clinica Neurologica, Bologna, Italy.
S Pritzkow *Department of Neurology, University of Texas Mcgovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Sandra.Pritzkow@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlpha-synucleinopathies are common disorders that are expected to become increasingly prevalent in the future along with the longer life expectancy. However, their diagnosis is problematic as they are mainly based on clinical criteria without the support of disease-specific biomarkers. This leads to frequent misdiagnoses, as underlined by autopsy studies, and an imprecise selection of patients for clinical trials, preventing progress in the development of disease-modifying treatments. In recent years important advances have been made regarding the development of specific biomarkers for the detection of pathological α-synuclein (α-syn), which may improve the diagnosis of patients affected by α-synucleinopathies.

resultsIn this review, we describe in detail the most promising techniques to detect pathological α-syn in patient-derived samples. In particular, we describe the diagnostic accuracy of each individual cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma and skin α-syn biomarker in differentiating α-synucleinopathies from controls, from other neurodegenerative disorders and between different α-synucleinopathies. Furthermore, we underline the main advantages and limitations of these techniques for clinical practice. Finally, we provide our suggestions for further development considering both technical aspects and large-scale standardization. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We conclude that immunofluorescence on biopsied skin tissue and the seed amplification assay on CSF show the best diagnostic accuracy and reliability in the studies that have been performed to date. We discuss the opportunities of these techniques as well as the main current limitations and technical problems that need to be considered before they can be adopted for clinical use.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinBiomarkersSynucleinopathiesHumansalpha-SynucleinBiomarkersBiomarkersImmunofluorescenceSeed amplification assaySkin biopsyα-synucleinopathies

Identifiers

PMID41345700
PMCPMC12781716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.