ArticleBMC nursing2025
Home-based rehabilitation nursing for post-stroke motor dysfunction: an evidence summary.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nurse-led caregiver training interventions in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional and psychosocial outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to summarize the best available evidence on home-based rehabilitation nursing for post-stroke motor dysfunction to inform and standardize clinical practice.
methodsThis evidence summary followed the standardized evidence summary reporting framework of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing (registration number: ES20246111). The process included identifying the clinical problem, retrieving evidence, screening literature, assessing methodological quality, and synthesizing and grading the evidence. A systematic search was conducted across the following databases from their inception to November 2024: BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, World Health Organization, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, Canadian Medical Association, United States Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, National Stroke Foundation, YiMaiTong Guideline Database, Chinese Stroke Association, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed. Literature types included clinical practice guidelines, expert consensus statements, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses focusing on home-based rehabilitation nursing for post-stroke motor dysfunction.
resultsThis study summarized seven aspects of best evidence, including rehabilitation management, rehabilitation assessment, motor function training, ADL training, assistive device support, psychological support, and risk management.
conclusionThis study synthesized the best available evidence on home-based rehabilitation nursing for patients with post-stroke motor dysfunction, identifying effective nursing strategies and key elements for implementation. The findings provide an evidence-based foundation to support the development of scientific, systematic, and standardized home rehabilitation nursing programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.