Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346110›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Lexical Representations in the Common and Specific Neural Networks for Visual, Phonological, and Semantic Processing in Chinese Reading.

Yuan Feng, Aqian Li, Xinqi Su, Huihui Zhu, Yujie Cao, Leilei Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuan FengPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
Aqian LiPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
Xinqi SuPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
Huihui ZhuPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
Yujie CaoPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.
Leilei MeiPhilosophy and Social Science Laboratory of Reading and Development in Children and Adolescents (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7443-1490

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2024A1515011023National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271098National Natural Science Foundation of China 32571226Research Center for Brain Cognition and Human Development, Guangdong, China 2024B0303390003Striving for the First-Class, Improving Weak Links and Highlighting Features (SIH) Key Discipline for Psychology in South China Normal University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated the common and specific neural correlates underlying visuo-orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing in word reading. However, it remains unclear how those networks represent different types of lexical information and how such representations and the interactions between networks are modulated by task-induced processing demands. To address this issue, 32 native Chinese participants were scanned with fMRI while performing a localizer task, and two reading tasks designed to elicit high demands on visuo-orthographic processing (i.e., structural judgment task) and semantic processing (i.e., familiarity judgment task). Activation analyses identified both common and specific neural networks involved in visual, phonological, and semantic processing. Representational similarity analysis (RSA) further revealed that the common network represented multiple types of lexical information, whereas the specific networks selectively represented particular lexical information corresponding to their respective processing type. Moreover, processing demands modulated lexical representations of common and specific networks in distinct ways: the common network exhibited flexible representational patterns, representing task-relevant lexical information under high processing demands, whereas the specific networks showed process-dependent selectivity, representing corresponding lexical information only under high processing demands. Functional connectivity analyses further indicated that processing demands could modulate connectivity patterns among networks, particularly between the common and specific networks. These findings highlight the distinct functional roles of common and specific networks, providing a new perspective on the complementary contributions of functionally overlapping and specialized systems in word reading.

Indexed as

BrainNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualPhoneticsReadingSemanticsAdultBrain MappingEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPhotic StimulationYoung Adultcommon networkfunctional connectivitylexical representationprocessing demandsspecific networkword reading

Identifiers

PMID41346110
PMCPMC12678634

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.