ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Targeted next-generation sequencing for respiratory infections in patients with haematological malignancies.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing next-generation microbial diagnostics to optimize infection management in immunocompromised hosts.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with haematological malignancies are immunocompromised and prone to respiratory infections, but identification of causative pathogens is challenging. The aim of this study was to analyse the ability of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) to detect pathogens in immunocompromised patients. Methods: tNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) were performed on samples from the respiratory tract of 99 patients with suspected respiratory infections. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was conducted in parallel in 43 patients. Comparative analysis was conducted using the Pearson χ2 test and Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Results: The overall microbial detection rates for tNGS were 100% (23/23) in the upper respiratory tract and 96.1% (99/103) in the lower respiratory tract. Microorganism colonization was detected by tNGS in 80.8% (97/120) of cases. The sensitivity of tNGS was approximately 30% higher than that of CMT (87.7% vs. 52.5%; Conclusions: Most immunosuppressed patients are colonized by microorganisms, and require prompt identification of the cause of any infections. tNGS has promising diagnostic potential and offers valuable information for optimizing antibiotic therapy, especially when compared to CMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.