Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346502›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Attention skills, learning and academic abilities in children and adolescents with genetic disorders: a systematic review.

Elena Commodari, Valentina Lucia La Rosa, Francesca Foti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena CommodariDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Valentina Lucia La RosaDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesca FotiDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Attention plays a crucial role in learning by enabling concentration and retention. Deficits in attention are frequently associated with academic difficulties, particularly among children and adolescents with genetic disorders. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to examine the relationship between attention and academic performance in individuals with Down syndrome (DS), Fragile X syndrome (FXS), Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), Klinefelter syndrome (KS), Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), Turner syndrome (TS), and Williams syndrome (WS). Eligible studies were identified through comprehensive database searches, and inclusion criteria focused on empirical research assessing both attention and academic outcomes. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (Registration No. CRD42024568993). Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, focusing primarily on DS, FXS, and NF1. No eligible studies were found for KS, PWS, TS, or WS. Across conditions, attention deficits were significantly associated with lower academic performance, although patterns varied by disorder. In NF1, persistent attention and inhibitory control deficits were linked to impairments in reading and math. Single studies on DS and FXS showed similar associations that warrant further replication. Discussion: Although the available evidence is limited, the findings suggest that attention plays a critical role in academic achievement among individuals with genetic disorders. Future research should expand the evidence base and develop targeted interventions to address attention deficits and support learning outcomes in these populations. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42024568993.

Indexed as

adolescentsattentionchildrengenetic disorderslearning

Identifiers

PMID41346502
PMCPMC12672454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.