Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346755›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Information quality of videos related to adolescent depression on social media platforms: a comparative study of TikTok and BiliBili.

Guiyun Wang, Jinke Kuang, Yanxia Qi, Jingya Li

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guiyun Wang *Shandong Xiehe University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jinke Kuang *Shandong Xiehe University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yanxia QiShandong Xiehe University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jingya LiShandong Mental Health Center, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of adolescent depression has been increasing globally in recent years, raising concern among the public about this condition. Videos on adolescent depression are disseminated through TikTok and Bilibili, both of which have gained popularity in recent years as easily accessible sources of health information. However, no researchers have conducted professional inspection and evaluation of depression-related videos targeting adolescents, some of these videos may even disseminate misleading information. Methods: We retrieved the top 100 adolescent depression related videos from TikTok and Bilibili. Data on video characteristics, including engagement metrics and content, were also collected. Video quality was assessed using three rating tools: the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN). The independent Results: The analysis included 188 videos, with 95 from TikTok and 93 from Bilibili. TikTok videos were shorter and exhibited higher audience interaction. The most popular topic on TikTok and Bilibili was "Symptoms of adolescent depression." Video creators were predominantly experts on TikTok (72.63%), and general users on Bilibili (56.99%). Video quality, assessed using JAMA, GQS, and mDISCERN, varied across platforms. There were statistically significant differences in the three quality scores among different types of creators on TikTok and Bilibili ( Conclusion: Videos on social media platforms can help the public gain knowledge about adolescent depression. However, the quality of video from all platforms requires improvement. Strengthening collaboration among content creators, mental health experts, and platform administrators may enhance video quality and ensure more accurate and effective dissemination of information.

Indexed as

DepressionInformation DisseminationSocial MediaVideo RecordingAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleadolescents depressionBilibiliquality analysissocial mediaTikTok

Identifiers

PMID41346755
PMCPMC12672318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.