ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting low muscle mass in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frailty and sarcopenia proxies are associated with postoperative outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction: a national database analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Baseline pain, fatigue, and sleep quality predict 12-week pain improvement in inflammatory arthritis: retrospective real-world analysis of a digital health application cohort.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to develop a predictive model for identifying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients at risk of low muscle mass using easily obtainable clinical indicators. The goal is to facilitate targeted screening for individuals at high risk of sarcopenia, optimize diagnostic strategies, reduce the burden of additional testing, and improve the efficiency of early identification and intervention. Methods: This study analyzed data from 1,260 RA patients obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database and the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (SHUTCM). Eight machine learning models were developed, including Random Forest, LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression, and a weighted ensemble model. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score, Precision, Recall, and Brier score loss. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to rank feature importance and interpret the final model. Results: Among all machine learning models, the tree-based weighted ensemble model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUC of 0.921, outperforming all individual models. The model exhibited good calibration and higher net clinical benefit in decision curve analysis, especially within the probability threshold range of 0.2 to 0.8, and achieved an AUC of 0.848 on the test set, demonstrating a certain degree of generalizability. SHAP analysis identified BMI, albumin, hemoglobin, age, and creatinine as the most important features for predicting the risk of low muscle mass. SHAP dependency and waterfall plots further showed the model's decision-making mechanisms. Finally, we developed an online risk prediction calculator based on the FastAPI framework, which automatically generates individualized low muscle mass risk scores based on user input. The tool has been deployed on the Hugging Face platform and is accessible online. Conclusion: Based on a large, multicenter dataset, we developed and validated an explainable ML model capable of identifying individuals with a high risk of low muscle mass among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This model may serve as a decision-support tool for clinicians in guiding further screening and diagnosis of sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.