ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Innovative gene targeted treatments for osteosarcoma: a mini review of current clinical evidence and future prospects.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptor protein CIN85 potentiates the motility of osteosarcoma cells via the Akt/mTOR and MMP2-COL3A1 axis.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Synergetic anticancer activity of psidium guajava-mediated palladium nanoparticles via apoptosis induction and metastasis suppression in osteosarcoma cells.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Precision oncology in the treatment of patients with bone sarcomas: an up-to-date narrative review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Integrative biomarker and drug target discovery in osteosarcoma: traditional experimental approaches and AI-enabled insights.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adolescents and young adults, marked by genomic instability and a high rate of lung metastasis. While surgery and intensive chemotherapy have improved survival for localized disease, outcomes for recurrent or metastatic cases remain poor, with limited progress in recent decades. In response, targeted therapies have emerged, focusing on key oncogenic pathways and tumor microenvironmental factors. Recent clinical studies have explored tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., sorafenib, regorafenib), PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors, angiogenesis modulators (e.g., apatinib), and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although some agents achieve transient disease stabilization or partial responses, their overall efficacy is constrained by tumor heterogeneity, rapid resistance, and the lack of predictive biomarkers. Notably, combination regimens-such as VEGF and mTOR inhibition or TKI with immunotherapy-have shown promise in preclinical and early clinical trials. Future directions emphasize precision medicine approaches, including liquid biopsies and molecular profiling to guide therapy selection. Nanotechnology-based delivery systems are also under development to enhance tumor targeting and reduce systemic toxicity. However, the rarity of osteosarcoma, trial design limitations, and treatment-related toxicities remain critical barriers. This review synthesizes current evidence and underscores the need for biomarker-driven, multimodal strategies to overcome resistance and improve long-term outcomes in osteosarcoma management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.