ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Cost-utility analysis of PCSK9 inhibitors for hypercholesterolemia: a Chinese healthcare perspective.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility of different dosing regimens of PCSK9 inhibitors, added to statin therapy, in patients with hypercholesterolemia or at high cardiovascular risk in China. Methods: A Markov cohort multistate-transition model was developed from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, with a 1-year cycle and lifetime horizon. Treatment effects were derived from a network meta-analysis. Costs, utilities, and mortality data were obtained from published literature and national databases. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5% annually. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at 1-3 times China's 2024 Results: In the base-case analysis, evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) was the most cost-effective option, dominating all other active regimens. Compared with statin therapy alone, it generated incremental costs of $11,109.27 and a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.42. The resulting ICUR was $26,217.47 per QALY, which is below the WTP threshold of $39,875.0 per QALY. Although less favorable than evolocumab, alirocumab 75 mg Q2W and tafolecimab 150 mg Q2W were also cost-effective versus statins alone, with ICURs of $34,279.73 and $34,002.10 per QALY, respectively. All other regimens were dominated, and inclisiran showed the least favorable cost-utility profile (ICUR $113,800.14 per QALY). Sensitivity analyses identified the discount rate as the key driver of uncertainty, with ICURs for evolocumab 140 mg Q2W versus statins alone ranging from $15,903.46 to $34,573.62 per QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 98.9% probability of evolocumab 140 mg Q2W being cost-effective versus statins alone. Conclusion: At the current negotiated price, evolocumab 140 mg Q2W is the most cost-effective PCSK9 inhibitor regimen for Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia or at high cardiovascular risk when added to statin therapy. Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W and tafolecimab 150 mg Q2W also represent cost-effective alternatives. These findings provide important evidence to support clinical decision-making and optimize resource allocation in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.