Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41347192›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2025

Metabolomics Analysis-Based Machine Learning for Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis: Integration of Biomarker Discovery and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Fatma Hilal Yagin, Abdulvahap Pinar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatma Hilal YaginDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Özal University, Malatya, Türkiye.
Abdulvahap PinarRectorate Unit, Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent gynecological malignancy in women worldwide. This study aims to develop a predictive model integrating machine learning (ML) approaches with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) using metabolomics panel data for significant biomarker discovery in EC. Materials and Methods: This study applied metabolomics and XAI to uncover diagnostic biomarkers for EC, the most common gynecologic malignancy. A total of 191 EC cases and 204 controls were analyzed using mass spectrometry. ML and XAI techniques were incorporated, including SHapley Additive exPlanation, Random Forest, BaggedCART, LightGBM, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Results: Statistically significant differences (adjusted p<0.05) were found in 25 metabolites. Effect sizes (ES) of m/z=219.125 (ES=1.516), m/z=672.6961 (ES=0.913), and m/z=203.1564 (ES=0.839) were notably large, suggesting strong discriminatory ability. These metabolites are involved in lipid dysregulation, steroid hormone pathways, and oxidative stress, reflecting cancer-specific metabolic reprogramming. The ML models, particularly LightGBM, demonstrated high accuracy and good calibration. After training with the final feature dataset, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified m/z=219.125, m/z=672.6961, and m/z=127.0769 as the top contributing features, aligning with their biological impact on EC pathogenesis. Conclusion: This study suggests non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of EC screening, highlighting the heterogeneity of metabolic adaptation in EC and the need for multi-omics approaches to understand disease mechanisms. Limitations include diverse cohorts and reliance on tandem mass spectrometry. Nonetheless, these findings represent a step forward in precision oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarker discoveryendometrial cancerexplainable artificial intelligence (AI)machine learningmetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID41347192
PMCPMC12673311

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.