ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2025
Metabolomics Analysis-Based Machine Learning for Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis: Integration of Biomarker Discovery and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Problems in the use of chemical and functional nomenclatures for steroids in human physiology, biology and pharmacology.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in endometrial cancer: multimodal deep learning and future perspectives in precision gynecologic oncology - a structured narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most frequent gynecological malignancy in women worldwide. This study aims to develop a predictive model integrating machine learning (ML) approaches with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) using metabolomics panel data for significant biomarker discovery in EC. Materials and Methods: This study applied metabolomics and XAI to uncover diagnostic biomarkers for EC, the most common gynecologic malignancy. A total of 191 EC cases and 204 controls were analyzed using mass spectrometry. ML and XAI techniques were incorporated, including SHapley Additive exPlanation, Random Forest, BaggedCART, LightGBM, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Results: Statistically significant differences (adjusted p<0.05) were found in 25 metabolites. Effect sizes (ES) of m/z=219.125 (ES=1.516), m/z=672.6961 (ES=0.913), and m/z=203.1564 (ES=0.839) were notably large, suggesting strong discriminatory ability. These metabolites are involved in lipid dysregulation, steroid hormone pathways, and oxidative stress, reflecting cancer-specific metabolic reprogramming. The ML models, particularly LightGBM, demonstrated high accuracy and good calibration. After training with the final feature dataset, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified m/z=219.125, m/z=672.6961, and m/z=127.0769 as the top contributing features, aligning with their biological impact on EC pathogenesis. Conclusion: This study suggests non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of EC screening, highlighting the heterogeneity of metabolic adaptation in EC and the need for multi-omics approaches to understand disease mechanisms. Limitations include diverse cohorts and reliance on tandem mass spectrometry. Nonetheless, these findings represent a step forward in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.