ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Molecular surprises in evaluations of red cell disorders.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding the Ektacytometric Landscape of Hereditary Spherocytosis: Insights from 204 Cases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Red cell disorders may present with overlapping clinical presentation and laboratory findings; in addition, complete phenotypic characterization of the patients' red cells is more challenging in the most severe cases, which are typically transfusion-dependent. The increasing availability of next-generation sequencing over the past 2 decades, initially with focused gene panels for certain disease groups, optimized to include the known coding and noncoding pathogenic variants for those diseases, has improved the accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis. The ongoing expansion to whole-exome and genome sequencing has been revealing unexpected, rare, overlooked, or previously unknown genetic disorders and expands our knowledge on the pathophysiology of known and novel human diseases. The vast information gained by genetic sequencing should still be checked against the phenotype to confirm agreement. A positive result does not always guarantee that the cause of the patient's symptoms has been identified; phenotype-genotype correlation is critical. In our era of targeted treatments and progress in gene therapy, utilization of genetic workup to improve the timing and precision of diagnosis is crucial to ensure that patients receive effective management, improving their outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.