ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2025
Optimizing the right time to start sickle cell therapies.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetically and clinically heterogeneous disorder marked by hemolysis and vaso-occlusion, leading to a wide range of acute and chronic complications. While newborn screening enables early identification, the optimal timing for initiating disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) remains a critical and evolving question. This review explores how genetic and clinical risk factors, along with phenotypic variability, influence treatment timing, emphasizing a shift toward earlier and more personalized interventions. Hydroxyurea, the most widely used DMT, demonstrates strong evidence for early initiation in severe genotypes yet is underutilized due to concerns around long-term effects and adherence challenges. Additional therapies, such as L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and formerly voxelotor, highlight the growing yet complex therapeutic landscape. Curative and transformative options, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and newly approved gene therapies, underscore the need for individualized decision-making based on risk, disease trajectory, and patient goals. Rethinking treatment paradigms to incorporate multiagent approaches, biomarker-driven strategies, and earlier intervention may yield improved outcomes. Ultimately, optimizing the timing of therapy initiation requires moving from reactive to proactive care models that consider risk, clinical severity, and evolving therapeutic options, with the goal of improving quality of life and long-term survival for individuals living with SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.