ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026
[Mental comorbidities among patients receiving intravitreal operative drug injections].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe experience of intravitreal treatment (IVT) is very heterogeneous among patients. This study investigated how the perceptions of disease and treatment differ for individuals with mental illnesses compared to individuals without mental comorbidities.
methodsSurveys on the experience of the illness and treatment were conducted at two eye clinics as part of the Hamburg registry for intravitreal injections. Mental comorbidities were assessed through self-reported mental diseases, a generalized anxiety disorder scale value ≥ 3 and moderate to severe anxiety/depression. For assessment of the experience of the disease the impairment of quality of life due to the eye condition was graded on a 6-point scale. Patients rated the treatment experience using scales (0-10) for the intensity of anxiety, tension and pain during the last injection. Group differences were analyzed based on the mean visual acuity using linear regression with age and gender as covariates.
resultsMental illnesses were present in 14.5% of patients. Of the patients with mental illnesses 27.1% reported a very severe impairment of quality of life (vs. 11.2% in the mentally healthy group), even though the mean visual acuity was comparable in both groups. Mentally ill patients reported higher mean levels of anxiety (+1.5 points, confidence interval, CI 0.76-2.16, p < 0.001) and physical tension (+1.2 points, CI 0.5-1.9, p < 0.001). The pain intensity was slightly but not significantly higher (+0.61 points, p = 0.058). DISCUSSION: Patients with mental comorbidity experience the illness and IVT more negatively than mentally healthy patients. It therefore makes sense to take the specific concerns of psychologically burdened patients into account when performing IVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41348162What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.