ReviewMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2025
Bioinformatics and artificial intelligence in genomic data analysis: current advances and future directions.
Review in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Omics Analyses Through Coalitional Games and Shapley Values.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Neuroprotective effects of traditional Chinese medicine using zebrafish models - a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in membranous nephropathy: transforming clinical management toward precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Genomic innovations in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and precision therapeutics.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Evolutionary Bioinformatics Expands its Breadth.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exponential growth of genomic data from next-generation sequencing technologies has created an urgent need for advanced computational approaches that can efficiently process, integrate, and interpret complex multi-dimensional biological information. This comprehensive review examines how artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, is transforming genomic data analysis and addressing critical limitations of traditional bioinformatics methods. A thorough literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, targeting peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2024. This review addresses a critical knowledge gap by synthesizing current AI applications across the genomic analysis pipeline, from variant calling to multi-omics integration and personalized medicine, whilst critically evaluating emerging technologies including explainable AI and federated learning. AI methods have significantly improved accuracy in variant calling, gene expression profiling, and disease risk prediction. Key findings demonstrate that deep learning models achieve superior performance in complex pattern recognition, whilst explainable AI addresses the "black box" problem essential for clinical adoption. Federated learning enables privacy-preserving collaborative research across institutions. However, significant challenges remain, including data standardization, computational costs, algorithm interpretability, and ethical considerations surrounding privacy and algorithmic bias. Future directions include quantum computing integration and AI-enhanced CRISPR technologies. This review concludes that whilst AI represents a transformative force in genomic research, successful clinical translation requires addressing current technical and ethical challenges through interdisciplinary collaboration, robust validation frameworks, and responsible implementation strategies prioritizing patient safety and data security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41348251What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.