ReviewDiscover oncology2025
Advancing breast cancer treatment through dual targeting CAR T cell therapy.
Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced liposomal nanoplatforms for flavonoid delivery: a mechanistic and comparative perspective in hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Immunological, Pathological, and Pharmacological Perspectives for Improving Patient Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy offers a next generation strategy to overcome the limitations of single antigen approaches in breast cancer, including antigen heterogeneity, immune escape, and the suppressive tumor microenvironment. This review summarizes current advances in vector design, comparing lentiviral, retroviral, and transposon platforms, and highlights key manufacturing challenges such as reduced transduction efficiency in dual scFv constructs (65–75% versus 92–98% for single target CAR T cells), prolonged vein to vein timelines (18–28 days), and increased production costs ($500,000–$700,000 per treatment). Safety considerations including cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and on target off tumor effects are discussed alongside the lack of predictive biomarkers for patient selection. The review further explores innovations in CAR engineering such as tandem and bicistronic configurations, logic gated SynNotch circuits, and affinity tuned costimulatory domains designed to enhance persistence and specificity. Advances in automated bioreactor systems, nonviral delivery methods, and AI guided manufacturing have improved scalability and cost efficiency. Integration with checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, and stromal remodeling agents shows promise for overcoming tumor microenvironmental barriers, while single cell antigen profiling and circulating tumor DNA monitoring enable more personalized dual antigen targeting. Emerging frontiers such as in vivo CAR engineering provide additional opportunities to simplify manufacturing and expand accessibility. Finally, regulatory innovation, decentralized production, and value based reimbursement models are discussed as essential components for translating dual targeting CAR T cell therapy from experimental development to a clinically viable and economically sustainable treatment for breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.