Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348323›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma and orthopedic surgery : Current practices across 36 German hospitals and comparison with recently published national guidelines.

Susanne Baertl, Siegmund Lang, Leopold Henssler, Lorenz Huber, Markus Rupp, Frank Hanses, Volker Alt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susanne BaertlDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. susanne.baertl@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5326-7273
Siegmund LangDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Leopold HensslerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lorenz HuberDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus RuppDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Frank HansesRegensburg University Center for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Volker AltDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Until 2024, no uniform nationwide guidelines existed in Germany regarding the optimal choice, dosage, and duration of perioperative antibiotic use.

methodsA nationwide survey was conducted among 36 German trauma and orthopedic centers to assess current practices of antibiotic prophylaxis in closed and open fractures, primary arthroplasty, and posterior spinal instrumentation. The questionnaire included the choice and duration of systemic antibiotics, empirical strategies, and the use of local antibiotics such as vancomycin powder. The current practice was then compared to the recently published S3-guideline "Perioperative and periinterventional antibiotic prophylaxis" (AWMF 067-009; https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/067-009 ) in Germany.

resultsFor closed fractures, 94.4% of hospitals used first- or second-generation cephalosporins, with single-shot administration. In Gustilo-Anderson (GA) type I open fractures, cefuroxime and ampicillin/sulbactam were each used by 13 hospitals (36.1%), with 63.9% applying a single-shot regimen. In type III open fractures, piperacillin/tazobactam was most common (33.3%), and 72 h prophylaxis was most frequently reported in both type II and III fractures (38.9%). In distal phalanx fractures, 94.4% of hospitals administered systemic antibiotics despite guideline recommendations to omit prophylaxis when no osteosynthesis is required. In arthroplasty, cefuroxime (50.0%) and cefazolin (41.7%) predominated, with single-shot use in 94.4%. In spine surgery, 38.9% additionally used local vancomycin powder.

conclusionWhile guideline adherence is high in routine indications, significant deviations remain in open fractures and distal phalanx fractures of the fingers. Extended prophylaxis beyond 72 h in GA type III fractures and the frequent use of antibiotics in distal phalanx injuries contrast with current recommendations. Stronger implementation of national standards is essential to reduce overtreatment and support antimicrobial stewardship.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisOrthopedic ProceduresPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surgical Wound InfectionFractures, BoneGermanyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prophylaxisEmpirical antibiotic therapyFracture-related infectionLocal antibiotic therapyPractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID41348323
PMCPMC12858472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.