ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma and orthopedic surgery : Current practices across 36 German hospitals and comparison with recently published national guidelines.
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma surgery and orthopedics].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Is cefazolin an appropriate choice for preoperative prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for fracture-related infection.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Until 2024, no uniform nationwide guidelines existed in Germany regarding the optimal choice, dosage, and duration of perioperative antibiotic use.
methodsA nationwide survey was conducted among 36 German trauma and orthopedic centers to assess current practices of antibiotic prophylaxis in closed and open fractures, primary arthroplasty, and posterior spinal instrumentation. The questionnaire included the choice and duration of systemic antibiotics, empirical strategies, and the use of local antibiotics such as vancomycin powder. The current practice was then compared to the recently published S3-guideline "Perioperative and periinterventional antibiotic prophylaxis" (AWMF 067-009; https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/067-009 ) in Germany.
resultsFor closed fractures, 94.4% of hospitals used first- or second-generation cephalosporins, with single-shot administration. In Gustilo-Anderson (GA) type I open fractures, cefuroxime and ampicillin/sulbactam were each used by 13 hospitals (36.1%), with 63.9% applying a single-shot regimen. In type III open fractures, piperacillin/tazobactam was most common (33.3%), and 72 h prophylaxis was most frequently reported in both type II and III fractures (38.9%). In distal phalanx fractures, 94.4% of hospitals administered systemic antibiotics despite guideline recommendations to omit prophylaxis when no osteosynthesis is required. In arthroplasty, cefuroxime (50.0%) and cefazolin (41.7%) predominated, with single-shot use in 94.4%. In spine surgery, 38.9% additionally used local vancomycin powder.
conclusionWhile guideline adherence is high in routine indications, significant deviations remain in open fractures and distal phalanx fractures of the fingers. Extended prophylaxis beyond 72 h in GA type III fractures and the frequent use of antibiotics in distal phalanx injuries contrast with current recommendations. Stronger implementation of national standards is essential to reduce overtreatment and support antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.