SynthesisJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Profiling cerebral hemodynamics in sepsis and septic shock patients with transcranial doppler: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological dysfunction is an early marker of sepsis. Cerebral hemodynamic disturbances are frequent in septic and septic shock and may play a key role in the development of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction. Our aim was to assess the existing evidence on the assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in sepsis with the use of transcranial Doppler (TCD). A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science was conducted for eligible studies. We included studies published in English up to January 2025 observational and interventional articles using TCD were included. We analyzed data provided by TCD, including middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), pulsatility index, cerebral autoregulation indices, cerebral vaso-reactivity, estimated intracranial pressure (eICP), critical closing pressure, and their relationship with clinical outcomes, such as cerebral dysfunction and mortality. This systematic review was recorded in PROSPERO with the ID CRD42023449660. After screening 371 articles, 62 were reviewed in full text, and 29 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1,087 patients were included, 558 of whom had confirmed septic shock. Mean MCA-v remained within normal limits, cerebral perfusion pressure was relatively low, without an increase in eICP. While cerebral autoregulation was often impaired in septic patients, assessment of cerebral vasoreactivity showed divergent results. The pulsatility index and impaired autoregulation were associated with the occurrence of neurological dysfunction. Cerebral hemodynamics are often altered in sepsis and septic shock and may contribute to neurological alterations observed in such patients. Further randomized trials are needed to identify effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41348410What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.