ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2026
DNA damage and repair in cardiomyopathy: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protective mechanisms of Sirtuin Family in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and translational therapeutic perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulating evidence from human clinical cohorts and animal models indicates that DNA damage plays a pivotal role in the initiation, progression, and severity of cardiomyopathy subtypes. Cardiomyocytes are exposed to continuous mechanical stress due to persistent contractile activity, and this stress is transduced to the nucleus, rendering CMs vulnerable to mechano-transduced DNA damage. CMs are also vulnerable to oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. The DNA damage response (DDR) constitutes a cellular program that integrates lesion sensors, signal transducers, downstream effectors, and repair machineries, thereby governing cell cycle progression and other cell fate decisions. DDR responses have been studied in proliferating cells, whereas adult CMs are withdrawn from the cell cycle, suggesting distinct DDR mechanisms and outcomes may occur in CMs. Although transient DDR activation helps preserve genomic stability in CMs, sustained activation contributes to maladaptive cardiac remodeling, functional decline, and disease progression. Several key DDR components have been identified as potential therapeutic targets, with their inhibition demonstrating cardioprotective effects in various cardiomyopathy models. Moreover, a growing number of novel pathways have emerged as promising avenues for targeting DNA damage and repair signaling in cardiomyopathy. In this review, we discussed molecular mechanisms by which DNA damage and DDR contribute to the onset and progression of cardiomyopathy, and highlight emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating DNA damage and repair pathways to improve cardiac function and clinical outcomes. Understanding how these pathways intersect with cardiomyocyte biology will be essential for translating bench discoveries into durable therapies for patients with cardiomyopathy and heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.