Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Single sperm karyotyping of testicular sperm in non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia using next generation sequencing.

Sumiko Sueyoshi, Akifumi Ijuin, Hiroe Ueno, Ai Miyakoshi, Haru Hamada, Misaki Toda, Naoki Tsuchiya, Miki Tanoshima, Mayuko Kurumizaka, Marina Saito and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sumiko SueyoshiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akifumi IjuinCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroe UenoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ai MiyakoshiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Haru HamadaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Misaki TodaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Naoki TsuchiyaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Miki TanoshimaDepartment of Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mayuko KurumizakaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Marina SaitoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuki OikeCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kazumi TakeshimaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Teppei TakeshimaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shinnosuke KurodaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-0297
Yasushi YumuraCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shin SaitoDepartment of Gynecology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ryoko AsanoDepartment of Gynecology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taichi MizushimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-4717
Etsuko MiyagiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hideya SakakibaraDepartment of Gynecology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroki KurahashiDivision of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Akira YanagiharaDivision of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Mariko MuraseCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomonari HayamaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8515-4134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sperm of infertile men have higher rates of chromosomal abnormalities than those of fertile men. Miscarriage rate is also higher following testicular sperm extraction combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (TESE-ICSI). Sperm chromosomal abnormalities are assumed to be the cause of miscarriages. Previous testicular sperm karyotyping studies have only examined a few selected chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The aim of this study was to provide a more detailed analysis of sperm karyotyping by analyzing all chromosomes using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinically usable testicular sperm. Sperm discarded after clinical use was collected for NGS. Additionally, sperm were individually collected by micromanipulation from patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) who underwent TESE-ICSI. For comparison, ejaculated sperm from control and balanced translocation (BT) carriers were examined. Karyotyping was performed on individual sperm cells using NGS. The number of normal and aberrant sperm was compared. Seventeen patients participated in this study: control (n = 4), BT (n = 3), OA (n = 5), and NOA (n = 5). Ten sperm samples per patient were analyzed. The total acquisition rate for single sperm karyotyping was 85% (145/170). Karyotyping of sperm from the BT group revealed sperm with unbalanced chromosomes derived from carrier translocations. Among the NOA group, 7/41 (17%) sperm samples exhibited aberrant karyotypes, whereas no aberrant sperm were identified in the control and OA groups. Individual differences were observed in the frequency of sperm chromosomal abnormalities among patients with NOA. In conclusion, sperm chromosomal abnormalities are frequently observed in patients with NOA even after sperm selection for clinical use. As the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities varies among patients with NOA, single sperm sequencing may help identify patients with NOA most likely to benefit from PGT-A.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingKaryotypingSpermatozoaTestisAdultChromosome AberrationsHumansMaleSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic

Identifiers

PMID41348833
PMCPMC12680224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.