Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348848›Full record

ReviewJMIR AI2025

Predicting Spinal Cord Injury Prognosis Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Linxing Zhong, Qiying Huang, Hao Zhang, Liang Xue, Yehuang Chen, Jianwu Wu, Liangfeng Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linxing ZhongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 156 West Second Ring North Road, Fuzhou, 350025, China, 86 13960760177, 86 591-87640785.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5948-4931
Qiying HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 156 West Second Ring North Road, Fuzhou, 350025, China, 86 13960760177, 86 591-87640785.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2463-8989
Hao ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 156 West Second Ring North Road, Fuzhou, 350025, China, 86 13960760177, 86 591-87640785.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7373-7801
Liang XueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 156 West Second Ring North Road, Fuzhou, 350025, China, 86 13960760177, 86 591-87640785.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-7936
Yehuang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 156 West Second Ring North Road, Fuzhou, 350025, China, 86 13960760177, 86 591-87640785.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7215-5456
Jianwu WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 156 West Second Ring North Road, Fuzhou, 350025, China, 86 13960760177, 86 591-87640785.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7890-2379
Liangfeng WeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 156 West Second Ring North Road, Fuzhou, 350025, China, 86 13960760177, 86 591-87640785.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2748-6306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is complicated and varied conditions that receive a lot of attention. However, the prognosis of patients with SCI is increasingly being predicted using machine learning (ML) techniques. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and caliber of ML models in forecasting the consequences of SCI. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PROSPERO, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and Wanfang databases. Meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ML models was performed to comprehensively evaluate their performance. Results: A total of 1254 articles were retrieved, and 13 eligible studies were included. Predictive outcomes included spinal cord function prognosis, postoperative complications, independent living ability, and walking ability. For spinal cord function prognosis, the area under the curve (AUC) of the random forest algorithm was 0.832, the AUC of the logistic regression algorithm was 0.813 (95% CI 0.805-0.883), the AUC of the decision tree algorithm was 0.747 (95% CI 0.677-0.802), and the AUC of the XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting) algorithm was 0.867. For postoperative complications, the AUC of the random forest algorithm was 0.627 (95% CI 0.441-0.812), the AUC of the logistic regression algorithm was 0.747 (95% CI 0.597-0.896), and the AUC of the decision tree algorithm was 0.688. For independent living ability, the AUC of the classification and regression tree model was 0.813. For walking ability, the model based on the vector machine algorithm was the most effective, with an AUC of 0.780. Conclusions: The ML models predict SCI outcomes with relative accuracy, particularly in spinal cord function prognosis. They are expected to become important tools for clinicians in assessing the prognosis of patients with SCI, with the XGBoost algorithm showing the best performance. Prediction models should continue to advance as large data are used and ML algorithms develop.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in health careclinical outcomes researchpredictive analyticsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPRISMAspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID41348848
PMCPMC12680090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.