Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348898›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2026

Foundations of systems-based hematology: thematic analysis of expert interviews to guide curriculums and promote growth.

Richard C Godby, Jacob Cogan, Adam Cuker, David Garcia, Ming Y Lim, Camila Masias, Jori E May, Colleen T Morton, Jordan K Schaefer, Surbhi Shah and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 'Medical Haematology' via systems-based haematology.British journal of haematology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Richard C GodbyDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-6362-1638
Jacob CoganDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Adam CukerDepartment of Medicine and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-5697
David GarciaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ming Y LimDivision of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0001-5208-3387
Camila MasiasBaptist Health, Miami, FL.
Jori E MayDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-5700
Colleen T MortonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Jordan K SchaeferDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-386X
Surbhi ShahMayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ.ORCID 0000-0003-0978-5687
Marc S ZumbergDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-475X
Ariela L MarshallDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-7388-0422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractSystems-based hematology (SBH) is an emerging discipline focused on optimizing care delivery for patients with hematologic disorders within complex health care systems. Despite its growing importance, the field lacks a formal definition, standardized curriculum, and clear career pathway, hindering widespread adoption and training of future SBH experts. We sought to define core principles, competencies, challenges, and future directions of SBH to identify foundational components for a potential educational curriculum. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 8 SBH experts. Expert participants were identified through their committee involvement with the American Society of Hematology. Five overarching themes emerged: (1) The accidental expert: SBH careers have developed organically and reactively in response to pressing institutional needs, not through formal training; (2) Defining the unseen: experts define the field pragmatically by its function and roles; (3) The SBH toolkit: success requires a hybrid skillset combining clinical hematology expertise with health systems science (HSS) principles; (4) The architect's dilemma: the field's growth is hindered by interdependent challenges of building a curriculum, awareness, and securing resources; and (5) Charting the future: the discipline is poised for growth, driven by increasing health care complexity and specialization. SBH represents the nexus of HSS principles and hematology care. Formalizing SBH requires a multipronged approach, including developing a standardized curriculum that equips learners with a hybrid skillset, creating clear value for health systems and patients, and fostering a community of practice through professional societies. These findings provide a foundational framework for developing educational resources and institutional support necessary to continue advancing SBH.

Indexed as

CurriculumHematologyHumansInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41348898
PMCPMC12995822

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.