Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41348917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A combined machine learning and finite element modelling tool for the surgical planning of craniosynostosis correction.

Itxasne Antúnez Sáenz, Ane Alberdi Aramendi, David Dunaway, Juling Ong, Lara Deliège, Amparo Sáenz, Anita Ahmadi Birjandi, Noor Ui Owase Jeelani, Silvia Schievano, Alessandro Borghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Itxasne Antúnez SáenzGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4575-2579
Ane Alberdi AramendiBiomedical Engineering Department, Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Loramendi Kalea, Arrasate, Spain.
David DunawayGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Juling OngGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Lara DeliègeGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Amparo SáenzGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6675-5428
Anita Ahmadi BirjandiGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-403X
Noor Ui Owase JeelaniGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Silvia SchievanoGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Alessandro BorghiGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1514-1979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniosynostosis is a medical condition that affects the growth of babies' heads, caused by an early fusion of cranial sutures. In recent decades, surgical treatments for craniosynostosis have significantly improved, leading to reduced invasiveness, faster recovery, and less blood loss. At Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), the main surgical treatment for patients diagnosed with sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) is spring assisted cranioplasty (SAC). This procedure involves a [Formula: see text] osteotomy, where two springs are inserted to induce distraction. Despite the numerous advantages of this surgical technique for patients, the outcome remains unpredictable due to the lack of efficient preoperative planning tools. The surgeon's experience and the baby's age are currently relied upon to determine the osteotomy location and spring selection. Previous tools for predicting the surgical outcome of SC relied on finite element modeling (FEM), which involved computed tomography (CT) imaging and required engineering expertise and lengthy calculations. The main goal of this research is to develop a real-time prediction tool for the surgical outcome of patients, eliminating the need for CT scans to minimise radiation exposure during preoperative planning. The proposed methodology involves creating personalised synthetic skulls based on three-dimensional (3D) photographs, incorporating population average values of suture location, skull thickness, and soft tissue properties. A machine learning (ML) surrogate model is employed to achieve the desired surgical outcome. The resulting multi-output support vector regressor model achieves a [Formula: see text] metric of 0.95 and MSE and MAE below 0.13. Furthermore, in the future, this model could not only simulate various surgical scenarios but also provide optimal parameters for achieving a maximum cranial index (CI).

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesFinite Element AnalysisMachine LearningCranial SuturesFemaleHumansInfantMaleOsteotomySkullTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID41348917
PMCPMC12680357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.