ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Improving polygenic risk prediction performance by integrating electronic health records through phenotype embedding.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell-type-specific polygenic risk scores reveal adipocyte-related interactions with lipids in coronary artery disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale biobanks provide comprehensive electronic health records (EHRs) that capture detailed clinical phenotypes, potentially enhancing disease prediction. However, traditional polygenic risk score (PRS) methods rely on simplified phenotype definitions or predefined trait sets, limiting their ability to represent the complex structures embedded within EHRs. To address this gap, we introduce EHR-embedding-enhanced PRS (EEPRS), leveraging phenotype embeddings derived from EHRs to improve PRSs using only genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. Employing embedding methods such as Word2Vec and GPT, we conducted EHR-embedding-based GWASs and identified a cardiovascular cluster via hierarchical clustering of genetic correlations. Across 41 traits in the UK Biobank, EEPRS consistently outperformed single-trait PRSs, particularly within this cluster. PRS-based phenome-wide association studies further demonstrated robust associations between EHR-embedding-based PRS and circulatory system diseases. We then developed EEPRS_optimal, a data-adaptive method that uses cross-validation to select the best embedding, yielding additional improvements. We also developed MTAG_EEPRS for multi-trait PRSs, which further improved prediction accuracy compared to single-trait PRSs and MTAG_PRS. Finally, we validated the benefits of EEPRS in the All of Us cohort for seven selected diseases. Overall, EEPRS represents a robust and interpretable framework, enhancing single-trait and multi-trait PRSs by integrating EHR embeddings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.