ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Automated generation of ablation lesion masks: a unison of electro and optic flow mapping for persistent AF virtual cohorts.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards mechanisms-driven strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: Leveraging digital twins.Journal of precision medicine (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Novel technologies and ablation techniques for identification of atrial fibrillation (AF) sources and personalized substrate modification may be required to improve outcomes for persistent AF. We hypothesize that a unison of electrophysiologic phase and optical flow mapping could be used to selectively prioritize ablation targets and optimize patient outcome while minimizing the tissue ablated. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of a novel electro-optic flow (EOF)-based ablation strategy for persistent AF patients using a virtual cohort of bi-atrial digital twins (DTs). A patient cohort (n=250) from a bi-atrial in silico population with different atrial fibrosis distributions was utilized to simulate five AF episodes per case. Phase singularity (PS) and average optical flow maps were computed for post-pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) sustained AF. Concordant regions, overlapping in at least three binarized PS maps were used to define regions to search for the highest optical curl cluster centroids as candidate EOF targets. Using optical curl as the weight, the centroid of five candidate EOF targets were computed and selected as an ablation target inside each concordant boundary. Six clinical ablation strategies were simulated. An inducibility-to-ablated tissue area metric was calculated to evaluate the efficacy of the tested ablation strategies. The pipeline automatically identified extra-PV targets and generated patient-specific EOF ablation plans. Electro-optic flow-guided ablations resulted in an average 32±2% AF inducibility, outperforming PVI (90±5%), and PVI+empiric (87±6%). Consensus-EOF further reduced inducibility to 20±5% while sparing 28±2% tissue as compared to PVI+PS ablation. Consensus mapping provides a novel method for assessing the dynamic nature of AF, while EOF offers a promising multimodal metric for identifying critical ablation targets outside of PVI. These findings underscore the potential of EOF-guided ablation planning in advancing the clinical translation of DT-based personalized therapy for PeAF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.