ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Implementing Equitable Hypertension Care Using a Remote Patient Monitoring Program: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Behavioral Intelligence in Action: Implementation Science and Cardiovascular Learning Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSystems-level approaches can promote equitable hypertension outcomes. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) is a patient-centered hypertension solution, but successful implementation strategies require further exploration.
objectivesThis study was designed to determine social and institutional factors of RPM utilization at an academic medical center.
methodsWe used a mixed methods study design. Using logistic regression, we retrospectively assessed the relation of sociodemographic variables with RPM engagement, achievement of normotension, and maintenance of normotension at 180 days post-RPM. We completed Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses to investigate the association of level of engagement and achieving normotension outcome. To augment the quantitative analysis, we concurrently interviewed RPM staff members to assess systems-level themes of RPM program implementation. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and inductively coded using a validated implementation framework.
resultsWe analyzed 1744 RPM program participants (mean age 63.1 years, 64.7% female, 82.6% Black) between May 2022 and August 2024. Patients with higher RPM engagement were older than those with lower engagement (65.6 years vs 62.3 years). The high engagement group differed by race, with more Black individuals in the high engagement group. High engagement (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.51-2.84; P < 0.001) was associated with likelihood of normotension and had a shorter time to normotension (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 2.14-2.98; P < 0.001). Ten key staff provided important insights of barriers and facilitators of RPM implementation that converged with statistical analyses.
conclusionsAn RPM program successfully improved blood pressure care, especially among patients with higher program engagement. These findings reveal opportunities for achieving equitable hypertension outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.