ArticleScientific reports2025
Sex-specific angiographic findings and clinical features in patients with myocardial infarction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare coronary angiography findings and angina pain patterns based on sex in patients with myocardial infarction. The focused and precise evaluation of gender differences in coronary angiography findings is limited, and this research seeks to bridge this gap. The present study is a cross-sectional study conducted on 341 patients with myocardial infarction at the Bushehr Heart Center, Iran. Simple random sampling was used as the sampling method. Data collection utilized demographic and clinical information forms, a researcher-made chest pain assessment checklist, and an angiography report checklist. For data analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test, and logistic regression were employed using SPSS 22 software. A significance level of 0.05 was considered for all analyses. The mean age of men was 56.89 ± 11.03 years, and the mean age of women was 59.14 ± 12.07 years. Angiography findings indicated that stenosis in the Mid-LCX (left Circumflex) artery is more prevalent in women than in men (OR = 4.867, p-value = 0.038). No significant differences were observed between genders in other angiography findings (p-value > 0.05). The mean intensity of pain scores in men (6.30 ± 1.80) was higher than in women (6.00 ± 1.91) (p-value = 0.141). Among demographic variables, maternal family history had a significant association with stenosis in LAD (Left Anterior Descending) and LCX arteries (p-value > 0.05). Additionally, blood group A negative had a significant association with stenosis in LAD (p-value = 0.001). The present study demonstrated that stenosis in small coronary vessels, such as Mid-LCX, is more prevalent in women than in men. Additionally, this study showed that most typical features of chest pain were similar between men and women. Moreover, individuals with blood groups A and B and a family history of heart disease on the maternal side exhibited the highest manifestations of coronary artery stenosis. Therefore, healthcare providers should consider risk factor classification, early intervention, and appropriate preventive measures for individuals with coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.