ArticleScientific reports2025
Acute 3.5-minute light-intensity exercise enhances executive function and psychological mood in children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior among children are increasing globally, raising concerns about physical and mental health, as well as brain development. Creating effective exercise programs in everyday settings (e.g., classrooms) is essential for supporting children's health. We examined whether brief, light-intensity exercise improves executive function (Color-word Stroop task; CWST) and mood (Two-Dimensional Mood Scale; TDMS). Thirty-one children (12.0 ± 1.1 years, 54.8% boys) completed a two-condition crossover trial: (1) control, where participants completed CWST and TDMS before and after 15-min seated rest; and (2) exercise, performing a 3.5-min light-intensity exercise during rest. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (Condition × Time) showed significant interactions for incongruent reaction time (F [1,30] = 8.33, η² = 0.22), pleasure (F [1,30] = 11.74, η² = 0.28), and arousal (F [1,30] = 5.91, η² = 0.17), indicating faster responses and higher pleasure after exercise versus control, with arousal maintained after exercise but declining in the control condition. However, no significant associations were observed between reaction time or pleasure improvements and prefrontal cortex activation changes. No significant interactions occurred for neutral reaction time or error rates. These findings suggest that this simple intervention could be a practical strategy for improving cognitive and emotional outcomes in schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.