Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350317›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Early detection of Alzheimer's disease progression: comparative evaluation of deep learning models.

Jayashree Shetty, Manjula K Shenoy, Sucheta V Kolekar, M Mukhyaprana Prabhu, Rusheel Reddy Kotha, Siddh Bhardwaj

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jayashree ShettyManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Manjula K ShenoyManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Sucheta V KolekarManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. sucheta.kolekar@manipal.edu.
M Mukhyaprana PrabhuDepartment of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. mm.prabhu@manipal.edu.
Rusheel Reddy KothaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Siddh BhardwajManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis and monitoring of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is particularly critical given the increasing number of cases worldwide. Improving forecasting precision using deep learning models on neuroimaging biomarkers can aid in more accurately predicting Alzheimer's associated disease progression. In this work, we assess two separate 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models for binary AD progression classification based on MRIs of the brain's structure. The first model uses a whole volume approach and processes entire MRI scans, thus requiring little computational power and minimal preprocessing compared to other methods. Alternatively, the second model applies voxel-level scrutiny by examining specific pre-defined brain regions that have statistically significant grey matter volume differences from cohort analyses. MRI preprocessing includes N4 bias field correction, segmentation of tissues, alignment to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, and Gaussian smoothing for homogenization of image quality. For the region-focused model, feature extraction is driven by neuroanatomy, concentrating on areas where AD shows shrinkage changes. The full-volume CNN achieved a 94% validation accuracy, demonstrating high computational efficiency with its simpler architecture, while the region-guided model reached 95% accuracy by leveraging more complex domain-specific structural biomarkers, highlighting enhanced performance at the cost of increased model intricacy. This study highlights the potential of combining deep learning frameworks with neuroimaging biomarkers to improve early detection and monitoring of AD. While our findings highlight the value of guided feature selection and volumetric data evaluation in improving diagnostic precision, they are derived solely from the ADNI dataset and must be validated on more diverse clinical populations.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDeep LearningAgedBiomarkersBrainDisease ProgressionEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural Networks, ComputerNeuroimagingBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41350317
PMCPMC12680636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.