Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350348›Full record

ArticleCell death discovery2025

Exploring p53 isoforms: unraveling heterogeneous p53 tumor suppressor functionality in uveal melanoma.

Laura Bartolomei, Yari Ciribilli, Samuele Brugnara, Francesco Reggiani, Gian Mario Moretta, Mariangela Petito, Elisa Marcaccini, Marianna Ambrosio, Carlo Mosci, Ulrich Pfeffer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The p53 Isoforms as Potential Biomarkers in Different Cancer Entities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Laura Bartolomei *Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Yari Ciribilli *Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-379X
Samuele BrugnaraDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Francesco ReggianiSSD Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Gian Mario MorettaDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Mariangela PetitoSSD Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Elisa MarcacciniUO Neuro-oncology and Mutagenesis, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Marianna AmbrosioDepartment of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Via L.B. Alberti 2, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Carlo MosciDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ocular Oncology Center, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
Ulrich PfefferSSD Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0872-4671
Adriana AmaroSSD Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy. adriana.amaro@hsanmartino.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-7756
Paola MontiUO Neuro-oncology and Mutagenesis, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy. paola.monti@hsanmartino.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-4998
Alessandra BisioDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, 38123, Trento, Italy. alessandra.bisio@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-1923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumor, and despite being rare, it accounts for nearly 13% of melanoma-related deaths. Indeed, patients with metastatic disease have typically survival rates of less than one year, with little improvement over the past few decades. Although TP53 mutations are uncommon in UM, recent findings highlight a dysfunctional p53 pathway in this cancer. Given its crucial role in mediating DNA damage responses, we analyzed the p53 protein functionality and downstream target activation in a panel of UM cell lines in response to standard-of-care treatments (i.e., cisplatin and proton-beam irradiation). Although most of the analyzed cells retained a wild-type p53, we observed a wide range of p53 protein stabilization and targets' activation. Recently, p53 isoforms have been recognized as modifiers of p53 activity, and their biology and functions depend on cellular context. We observed that UM cells express a broad spectrum of p53 isoforms, including Δ160p53α and Δ133p53β and the longer variants Δ40p53β and p53β. Interestingly, the down-regulation of the short p53 isoforms (Δ133/Δ160) revealed their contribution to promoting cell growth and in mitigating cell death triggered by standard-of-care therapies. Moreover, we verified the wild-type p53 status in a panel of 32 UM cases and analyzed the expression levels of p53 isoforms. Our results indicated a correlation between higher expression levels of Δ40p53α or Δ133p53γ isoforms and the development of more aggressive cancers. Our findings suggest that shorter p53 isoforms can promote cancer aggressiveness and therapy resistance, thereby providing crucial insights into UM pathogenesis.

Identifiers

PMID41350348
PMCPMC12827457

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.