Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350378›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

The effect of apical preparation size and passive ultrasonic activation on microbial load in root canals with periapical lesions.

Melike Yavuz, Tan Fırat Eyuboglu, Seyda Ersahan Eroglu, Yelda Erdem Hepsenoglu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07005219 (Efficacy of Minimal vs. Conventional Apical Preparation With Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in Reducing Intracanal Bacteria), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07005219 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Minimal vs. Conventional Apical Preparation With Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in Reducing Intracanal Bacteria: A Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsPeriapical Periodontitis, Root Canal InfectionArmsRoot canal shaping with One Curve Mini #25/0.4 and passive ultrasonic irrigation, Root canal shaping with One Curve Mini #35/0.4 and passive ultrasonic irrigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melike YavuzDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Cibali Mahallesi, Atatürk Bulvari, No: 27, 34083, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5358-1627
Tan Fırat EyubogluDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Cibali Mahallesi, Atatürk Bulvari, No: 27, 34083, Istanbul, Turkey. tfeyuboglu@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-9579
Seyda Ersahan ErogluDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Cibali Mahallesi, Atatürk Bulvari, No: 27, 34083, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-5108
Yelda Erdem HepsenogluDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Cibali Mahallesi, Atatürk Bulvari, No: 27, 34083, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-1288

Funding

İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi 2022-40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares intracanal bacterial reduction between two apical enlargement approaches in teeth with periapical lesions, evaluating the influence of shaping size with irrigation activation during root canal treatment. Twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: minimally invasive (25/0.04) and conventional (35/0.04). Root canal samples were obtained before and after chemomechanical preparation and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Bacterial load was quantified by droplet digital PCR, and bacterial species were identified by sequencing. Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in bacterial load exceeding 95% (p < 0.01), with no significant intergroup differences (p > 0.05). The conventional group exhibited higher preoperative pain scores (p = 0.042), while postoperative pain levels were comparable between groups. Pseudomonas spp. were more prevalent at baseline in the conventional group (p = 0.048). Despite effective bacterial reduction in both groups, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas persisted after treatment, indicating the need for improved disinfection protocols and activation techniques for resistant biofilm-forming microorganisms.Trial registrationThe protocol was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07005219) on 22/5/2025.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadDental Pulp CavityRoot Canal PreparationAdultEnterococcus faecalisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPseudomonasApical periodontitisBacterial speciesDdPCRIrrigation activationPassive ultrasonic system

Identifiers

PMID41350378
PMCPMC12789669

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.