Trial reportScientific reports2025
The effect of apical preparation size and passive ultrasonic activation on microbial load in root canals with periapical lesions.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07005219 (Efficacy of Minimal vs. Conventional Apical Preparation With Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in Reducing Intracanal Bacteria), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Minimal vs. Conventional Apical Preparation With Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in Reducing Intracanal Bacteria: A Clinical Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Effect of Coronal Flaring on SWEEPS Laser-Activated Irrigation in Root Canals with Different Curvatures: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares intracanal bacterial reduction between two apical enlargement approaches in teeth with periapical lesions, evaluating the influence of shaping size with irrigation activation during root canal treatment. Twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: minimally invasive (25/0.04) and conventional (35/0.04). Root canal samples were obtained before and after chemomechanical preparation and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Bacterial load was quantified by droplet digital PCR, and bacterial species were identified by sequencing. Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in bacterial load exceeding 95% (p < 0.01), with no significant intergroup differences (p > 0.05). The conventional group exhibited higher preoperative pain scores (p = 0.042), while postoperative pain levels were comparable between groups. Pseudomonas spp. were more prevalent at baseline in the conventional group (p = 0.048). Despite effective bacterial reduction in both groups, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas persisted after treatment, indicating the need for improved disinfection protocols and activation techniques for resistant biofilm-forming microorganisms.Trial registrationThe protocol was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT07005219) on 22/5/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.