ArticleScientific reports2025
Plasma proteomics to explore benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 in advanced solid tumors: a prospective pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards liquid biopsy-based analysis of antitumour immunity.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-PD-(L)1 therapies are widely used for the treatment of distinct cancers, but the proportion of patients who benefit from the treatment remains low, and tools for patient selection are suboptimal. In this study, we investigated whether plasma proteomics could explore the benefit of anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies. This prospective study enrolled 56 patients with multiple solid tumor types treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Pre-treatment plasma samples were profiled with a 92-plex immuno-oncology proximity extension assay panel. Associations with radiographic outcomes and survival were examined. Prediction models for ORR, DCR and OS were evaluated. Analyses were performed in a pooled hypothesis-generating framework. Several proteins, including ADGRG1 and ARG1, were linked to radiographic response. ARG1 achieved ROC-AUCs 0.68 (ORR) and 0.53 (DCR). We generated machine learning models for predicting both radiographic responses and long-term survival (≥ 720 days). For overall survival, the six-protein Cox proportional model separated risk groups (hazard ratio (HR) 4.8; CI 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–10.9), while larger panels increased separation, they are prone to over-fit and require validation. Unsupervised clustering did not show dominant segregation by tumor type. Our findings from this small prospective heterogeneous cohort support that plasma proteomics show promising but preliminary results in predicting the benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in multiple advanced solid tumors. Findings regarding DCR and ORR modeling should be interpreted as exploratory and require external validation, both tumor-specific and pan-cancer, before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.