Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41350443›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026

The neuronal circuits and cellular encoding of thermosensation.

Mario Carta, Mikkel Vestergaard, James F A Poulet

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mario Carta *Institut Interdisciplinaire de Neurosciences, CNRS UMR 5297, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. mario.carta@u-bordeaux.fr.
Mikkel Vestergaard *Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. vestergaard@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-8099
James F A PouletMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany. james.poulet@mdc-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-5415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural circuits processing thermal information play a key role in shaping somatosensory perception, regulating core body temperature and avoiding harm. The circuits underlying thermal perception are less understood than for other sensory systems, but recent research has shed light on the wiring, cellular encoding principles and their link to perception. While thermosensation was traditionally viewed as a slower, modulatory sense, it is now recognized as a fast and sensitive sensory system that exhibits complex features such as multisensory integration and sensory illusions. Here, we highlight recent progress in the understanding of innocuous thermal processing and perception and attempt to identify the principles of wiring of the thermal system and cellular encoding of temperature across mammals and insects. Intriguingly, while warm and cool reflect the same physical property, there are notable differences in their perception and encoding in the nervous system. We argue that the thermal system is an ideal model to advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms of sensory perception and sensory-guided behaviours.

Indexed as

Nerve NetNeuronsThermosensingAnimalsHumansNeural Pathways

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.