ArticleNature computational science2026
Scouter predicts transcriptional responses to genetic perturbations with large language model embeddings.
Article in Nature computational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics-driven precision medicine.iMeta · 2026Review
- CoxFormer enables spatial omics inference with multimodal generative modeling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Instability of LLM text embeddings for unsupervised dimension reduction of tabular data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Scouter predicts transcriptional responses to genetic perturbations with large language model embeddings.Nature computational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene perturbation experiments followed by transcriptomic profiling are vital for uncovering causal gene effects. However, their limited throughput leaves many perturbations of interest unexplored. Computational methods are therefore needed to predict genome-wide transcriptional responses to gene perturbations that were not experimentally assayed within a given dataset. Existing approaches often rely on Gene Ontology graphs to encode prior knowledge, but their predictive power and applicability are constrained by the graphs' sparsity and incomplete gene coverage. Here we present Scouter, a computational method that uses gene embeddings generated by large language models and a lightweight compressor-generator neural network. Scouter accurately predicts transcriptional responses to both single- and two-gene perturbations, reducing errors from state-of-the-art Gene Ontology-term-based methods (GEARS and biolord) by half or more. Unlike recent approaches based on fine-tuning gene expression foundation models, Scouter offers substantially better accuracy and greater accessibility; it requires no pretraining and runs efficiently on standard hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.