ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
The cost of explainability in artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram models.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between echocardiographic traits and artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography predictions of heart failure.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and the evolution of the electrocardiogram: from cardiovascular diagnostic tool to digital biomarker.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- A lesson from the past and the future of artificial intelligence in medical decision-making.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Promises and challenges of AI-enabled methods for myocardial characterisation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) models have shown outstanding performance in diagnostic and prognostic tasks, yet their black-box nature hampers clinical adoption. Meanwhile, a growing demand for explainable AI in medicine underscores the need for transparent, trustworthy decision-making. Moving beyond post-hoc explainability techniques that have shown unreliable results, we focus on explicit representation learning using variational autoencoders (VAE) to capture inherently interpretable ECG features. While VAEs have demonstrated potential for ECG interpretability, the presumed performance-explainability trade-off remains underexplored, with many studies relying on complex, non-linear methods that obscure the morphological information of the features. In this work, we present a novel framework (VAE-SCAN) to model bi-directional, interpretable associations between ECG features and clinical factors. We also investigate how different representations affect ECG decoding performance across models with varying levels of explainability. Our findings demonstrate the cost introduced by intrinsic ECG interpretability, based on which we discuss potential implications and directions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.