ArticleBMC biology2025
Signals of corresponding genetic diversity loss in four warbler species exhibiting regional or range-wide declines.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnthropogenic forces have resulted in staggering losses of biodiversity and population declines in many species over the past two centuries. Associated with these declines are potential adverse effects linked to small population sizes, including loss of genetic diversity and increased levels of inbreeding. Here, we leverage DNA sequencing from museum specimens to examine genetic variation between historic and contemporary populations of four species of warblers (Aves, Setophaga) that vary with respect to degree of population changes over this period. To explore the genetic impacts of varying population declines, we gathered polymorphism data at 157 PCR-amplified loci in 341 individuals sampled in two time periods-historic (1789-1955) vs contemporary (2001-2020).
resultsFor all four species, we observed decreases in nucleotide diversity and heterozygosity in contemporary data sets compared to historic data sets. In three species, this loss was accompanied by a corresponding increase in inbreeding coefficient F
conclusionOur findings suggest that loss of genetic diversity resulting from historic population declines persists over time (50-100 years), even when population trajectories later stabilize. Our results highlight the utility of long-term genetic temporal comparisons to reveal hidden genetic diversity loss and reveal important considerations for managing genetic diversity loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.