SynthesisNursing & health sciences2025
Parent-Infant Attachment and Gross Motor Development During the First 2 Years of Life: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Parent-Infant Attachment and Gross Motor Development During the First 2 Years of Life: A Systematic Review.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The attachment system is crucial in several aspects of child development. We aimed at synthesizing the existing knowledge on the association between mother/father attachment to the infant and gross motor development during the first 2 years of life. A systematic review following PRISMA standards was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42022308841) in April 2022 and conducted in May 2022 (updated: July 2023, July 2024, and January 2025). PubMed, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and PSICODOC databases were searched. Peer-reviewed observational studies in English or Spanish with a minimum score of five on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, used for assessing bias risk, were included. Results are critically presented and synthesized. Ten studies were selected out of the initial pool of 813 records. Findings are described based on the parent-infant attachment and gross motor development, the association of parental roles and co-parenting dynamics, and the effect of stress on motor development. Positive early parent-infant interactions and secure parent-infant attachment are associated with better infant motor development. Studies with larger samples and more specific motor assessments are suggested for the advancement of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.