ReviewBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Noninvasive brain stimulation and athletic performance: a critical narrative review.
Review in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In light of recent advances in sports medicine and neurorehabilitation, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)-including techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)-show potential for enhancing sports performance and supporting rehabilitation. For this narrative critical review, we synthesized evidence from studies in which trained athletes and healthy individuals performed sports-related tasks. These studies were identified through a structured search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The findings indicate that NIBS can modulate neural activity to improve motor learning, skill acquisition, muscle strength, endurance, attention, decision-making, emotional regulation, and brain network plasticity, with a notable potential to accelerate the mastery of sport-specific skills essential for competitive success. Nevertheless, heterogeneity in study designs and stimulation protocols, alongside unresolved ethical concerns regarding athlete autonomy and fairness, continue to limit widespread adoption. While NIBS holds considerable promise for both athletic performance optimization and rehabilitation, further research is needed to clarify its mechanisms of action, standardize protocols, and establish robust ethical guidelines to safeguard athlete safety and integrity and fair competition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.