ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Nomogram for reducing unnecessary biopsies of breast lesions based on MRI and clinical features: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is a widely accepted standardized framework for breast imaging interpretation including ultrasound, mammogram and magnetic resonance. Intermediate BI-RADS categories nodules currently require further biopsy or surgical resection to obtain pathological information. Notably, many such nodules are ultimately diagnosed as benign, prompting us to question whether intermediate BI-RADS categories nodules truly need invasive procedures. Additionally, malignancy rates of intermediate BI-RADS nodules vary across age groups and are influenced by clinical/biochemical factors. Therefore, a pressing challenge is to leverage current diagnostic tools for more precise identification of nodules that truly require biopsy, thereby reducing unnecessary invasive interventions. This study aims to address these challenges by integrating radiomics features with clinical and biochemical data to improve diagnostic accuracy.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 384 breast nodule patients from two medical centers with preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and blood biochemical tests, allocated into training and external test sets. A total of 3,948 radiomic features were extracted from DCE-MRI images and integrated with clinical characteristics. After 5-fold cross-validation for high-frequency feature selection, a malignancy-predicting nomogram was developed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated via area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with DeLong test against BI-RADS. Under the sensitivity threshold of > 95%, McNemar's test compared the specificity between the nomogram and BI-RADS to evaluate their biopsy reduction capabilities.
resultsThe nomogram yielded an AUC of 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-0.92] in the training cohort and an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96) in the test cohort. When applying the cut-off value with ≥ 95% sensitivity, the nomogram can reduce unnecessary biopsies by 12.8% (16/125) in the training cohort and 25% (9/36) in the test cohort when compared with BI-RADS (p = 0.068 in training cohort and p = 0.078 in test cohort).
conclusionsWe have established a nomogram based on DCE-MRI radiomics and clinical risk factors to distinguish malignant from benign breast lesions, and demonstrated potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies, serving as a supplementary tool for BI-RADS-based clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.