ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel graph-based centralized and decentralized approaches for early AKI prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a life-threatening problem for hospitalized patients, and early detection is crucial to reduce severe outcomes. Traditional predictive methods lack in monitoring complex physiological patterns and ensuring data privacy in decentralized healthcare settings. The study aims to develop and evaluate two distinctly complementary novel graph-based approaches, namely the centralized Graph Attention Network (GAT) and the decentralized model, Gossip Learning with Adaptive Aggregation GAT (GL-AA-GAT), to identify AKI onset between 6 and 12 h in advance, using physiological time-series data from the Kaggle Sepsis dataset. Multi-Head Attention is used for modeling feature interactions in centralized GAT, while GL-AA-GAT can further achieve this by decentralized training of five nodes using gossip exchange and adaptive aggregation for privacy and scalability. Through its novel graph structure, centralized GAT predicts the onset of AKI with an accuracy of 94.1%, sensitivity of 94%, AUC-ROC of 95%, and AUPRC of 91%. With decentralized privacy additions, GL-AA-GAT achieves an accuracy of 92.8%, a sensitivity of 93%, an AUC-ROC of 93.8%, and an AUPRC of 90%, with robustness. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the performance was stable with the prediction horizons and correlation thresholds, and external validation on non-sepsis cohorts of the ICU further indicated generalizability. Both models outperform existing models, which means high predictive reliability. The GL-AA-GAT's distributed approach gives privacy and flexibility, making it innovative for distributed clinical environments, with task scheduling enhancing training efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.