ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026
Evaluation of drug distribution, sensory and motor blockade regions in canine coccygeal epidural anesthesia.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The distribution of anesthetic solutions, sensory blockade (SB), and motor blockade (MB) following coccygeal epidural anesthesia in dogs were evaluated. Six dogs received three different doses (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mL/kg) of a mixture containing equal volumes of ropivacaine and iohexol, administered via the first and second coccygeal intervertebral spaces. Drug spread was assessed using computed tomography, whereas SB and MB were evaluated using standardized scoring methods. The cranial extent of contrast medium spread reached L5, the L4-5 interspace, and L4 in the 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mL/kg groups, respectively, with no significant differences among groups. SB extended from the tail to the cranial femoral region in the 0.1 mL/kg group, to the caudal femoral-pubic region in the 0.2 mL/kg group, and to the cranial femoral-pubic region in the 0.3 mL/kg group. The 0.2 and 0.3 mL/kg groups showed significantly higher SB than the 0.1 mL/kg group did (P=0.039 and P=0.019, respectively). MB extended to the femoral nerve territory in dogs receiving 0.2 or 0.3 mL/kg, while dogs in the 0.1 mL/kg group maintained motor function. The 0.3 mL/kg group showed significantly higher MB than the 0.1 mL/kg group did (P=0.019). Despite the increased volume at 0.3 mL/kg, greater leakage through the neural foramina resulted in a net epidural dosage comparable to 0.2 mL/kg. These findings indicate that coccygeal anesthesia at 0.1 mL/kg provides SB from the tail to the perineal region while maintaining hindlimb motor function in dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.