Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41354659›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Benchmarking pre-trained genomic language models for RNA sequence-related predictive applications.

Ningyuan You, Chang Liu, Hai Lin, Sai Wu, Gang Chen, Ning Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. mArXiv · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ningyuan You *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital & Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3630-1604
Chang Liu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital & Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-7737
Hai LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital & Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Sai WuState Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Gang ChenState Key Laboratory of Blockchain and Data Security, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ning ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital & Liangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. shenningzju@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-3374

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82471904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA plays a central role in diverse cellular functions across organisms, making the development of computational methods for RNA sequence analysis highly valuable. Recently, pre-trained genomic language models (gLMs) have emerged, offering enhanced flexibility for a range of downstream prediction tasks; however, comprehensive, unbiased evaluations remain limited. In this study, we benchmark eleven gLMs, alongside task-specific methods as comparison, across four RNA processes: non-coding RNA classification, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification prediction, alternative splice site prediction, and translation efficiency prediction. Rather than relying solely on increased data volume and model scale, our benchmark analysis demonstrates that outstanding performance arises from synergizing data and algorithms with the biological context. By systematically profiling factors such as pre-training datasets, input context lengths, and tokenization schemes, we demonstrate how specific models achieve superior performance in relevant tasks. While task-specific methods can achieve comparable results with greater computational efficiency under certain conditions, gLMs outperform these approaches when training data is limited or highly imbalanced. Finally, we offer targeted recommendations for model selection across diverse research contexts. Overall, our evaluation underscores both the promise of gLMs and the need for continued refinement to advance future biomedical research.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsModels, GeneticRNASequence Analysis, RNAAdenosineAlgorithmsBenchmarkingHumansRNA, UntranslatedAdenosineN-methyladenosineRNARNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID41354659
PMCPMC12780105

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.