ReviewJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2025
A narrative review of therapy-induced senescence in cancer: mechanisms, immune interplay, and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapy-induced senescence (TIS) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism in cancer therapy, exerting both tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting effects. By enforcing stable cell-cycle arrest, TIS prevents proliferation of damaged cancer cells while simultaneously reprogramming the tumor microenvironment (TME) through the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). This secretome recruits and activates innate and adaptive immune effectors, thereby enhancing immune clearance and sensitizing tumors to immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the chronic persistence of senescent cells and sustained SASP can paradoxically foster immune suppression, angiogenesis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and tumor relapse. Preclinical data demonstrate that combining senescence-inducing therapies with immunotherapies produces synergistic effects, particularly when paired with senolytic agents to eliminate residual senescent cells. Early clinical trials, especially those integrating CDK4/6 inhibitors with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, highlight promising translational opportunities but also underscore critical challenges, including therapy sequencing, SASP heterogeneity, and T-cell suppression. Biomarker development remains essential to monitor senescence dynamics and immune modulation in real time. This review synthesizes mechanistic insights into TIS, its immunological interplay, and emerging therapeutic strategies, advocating for a rational “induce–prime–purge” framework. Leveraging TIS in combination with immunotherapies and senolytics holds the potential to transform refractory tumors into immune-responsive states while minimizing risks of relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.