Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41355312›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

A Sisterhood of Women: The Process of Co-Creating Recommendations for Improved Pessary Self-Management Support.

Lucy Dwyer, Sofia Tibuzzi, Kerrianne O'Rourke, Dawn Dowding, Rohna Kearney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucy DwyerDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0284-873X
Sofia TibuzziParticipant, London, UK.
Kerrianne O'RourkeRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Women's Network, London Bridge, UK.
Dawn DowdingDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rohna KearneySaint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.

Funding

National Institute of Health and Care Research NIHR300519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis work aimed to explore barriers to pessary self-management and co-create strategies to address these.

designParticipatory Action Research.

methodsIn October 2024, eight pessary-using women living in the United Kingdom participated in cooperative inquiry, discussion and co-creation of strategies in two virtual workshops.

resultsPessary using women who participated in this research identified challenges affecting willingness to self-manage a pessary and proposed solutions to address these and better support women. Pessary practitioners should assess physical capabilities, consider softer, more malleable pessaries, and explore the possibility of a pessary applicator. Peer support was seen as empowering, enabling self-advocacy and improved care; therefore, establishing peer networks was prioritised. Major barriers included difficulty navigating services and limited access to a full range of pessaries, leading some women to buy devices online without medical oversight, creating a two-tier system based on ability to pay. The group called for improved, standardised pessary care, and for self-management to be reframed to avoid women feeling 'fobbed off' through better follow-up, positive language, and compassionate care.

conclusionsThe group identified strategies to address barriers to pessary self-management which require further exploration. Pessary practitioners have a responsibility to listen to these voices and take steps to improve care for women in the future. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: To support women's willingness to self-manage their pessary, pessary practitioners should consider and support women to overcome physical and emotional barriers; improve information provision; maximise social support; boost women's perceived self-efficacy; reframe pessary self-management and ensure robust, accessible follow-up is in place. This will ensure pessary-using women are supported to make an informed decision about pessary self-management. This research offers pessary practitioners insight into barriers women perceive to pessary self-management and guidance as to how women can be supported to self-manage their pessary. IMPACT: Only 21% of women are willing to self-manage their pessary. Therefore, this research aimed to co-create strategies to better support women to self-manage their pessary and overcome barriers to willingness. Women reported individual, societal and service factors which affect willingness to self-manage a pessary. These research findings should be translated into clinical practice and care delivery for pessary using women in both a community and hospital setting. REPORTING

methodCOREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) Checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and members of the public were involved in research prioritization, study design, data analysis, interpretation of findings and dissemination. STUDY REGISTRATION: Study not registered.

Indexed as

PessariesSelf-ManagementSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSelf CareUnited Kingdomco‐creationpessaryPPIprolapseself‐careself‐management

Identifiers

PMID41355312
PMCPMC13356375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.