Evidence mapPaperPMID 41355918Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025

Tight junction disruption

Noura A A Ebrahim, Tamer S Eissa, Mustafa A Hussein, Omnia Mohamed Korany, Nancy H Amin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noura A A EbrahimDepartment of Oncologic Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Al Qāhirah, Egypt. npathologist@gmail.com.
Tamer S EissaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Al Qāhirah, Egypt.
Mustafa A HusseinDepartment of Oncologic Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Al Qāhirah, Egypt.
Omnia Mohamed KoranyDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Al Qāhirah, Egypt.
Nancy H AminDepartment of Oncologic Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Al Qāhirah, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClaudin-6 (CLDN6), a tight junction protein typically restricted to embryonic tissues, is re-expressed in various cancers. However, its prognostic significance in high-grade endometrial carcinoma (HGEC) remains unclear.

aimTo investigate the expression pattern of CLDN6 in HGEC and assess its correlation with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival.

methodsImmunohistochemical analysis of CLDN6 expression was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 80 patients diagnosed with HGEC. Associations between CLDN6 expression and histological subtype, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, depth of myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, recurrence, and survival outcomes were statistically analysed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify independent prognostic factors.

resultsHigh CLDN6 expression was detected in a subset of HGEC patients and was significantly associated with nonendometrioid histology (

conclusionCLDN6 overexpression is associated with aggressive tumor features and poor clinical outcomes in HGEC, suggesting its utility as a prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Claudin-6High-grade endometrial carcinomaImmunohistochemistryPrognostic biomarkerSurvival analysisTumor aggressiveness

Identifiers

PMID41355918
PMCPMC12678961

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.