ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
Caregivers' beliefs about hydroxyurea influence its usage among children with sickle cell disease: a cross-sectional study in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: hydroxyurea (HU) is a proven, safe, and effective treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD) but is underutilized in Tanzania. Caregivers´ beliefs influence medication usage in children with chronic diseases. This study assessed caregivers´ beliefs about HU and their effect on HU use among children with SCD in Dar-es-Salaam. Methods: a cross-sectional study enrolled 374 caregivers from four hospitals in Dar-es-Salaam. We adapted the "Belief About Medication Questionnaire" to assess caregivers´ beliefs about HU necessity and concerns. Scores of ≥15 indicated high necessity/concerns. Caregivers were categorized into four belief patterns: positive (high necessity, low concerns), negative (low necessity, high concerns), ambivalent (high necessity, high concerns), and indifferent (low necessity, low concerns). Results: seventy percent of caregivers reported HU usage, 63% exhibited positive beliefs, with 95% of them reporting HU use. Caregivers with an indifferent belief category made up 43% of those with non-positive beliefs, and only 7% of them reported HU use. Thirty-eight percent of caregivers were concerned about HU's long-term effects, whereas 67% perceived that HU protects their children´s health from worsening. Caregivers with positive beliefs were 14 times more likely to report HU use than those with indifferent HU beliefs (IRR 14.3, 95% CI: 5.5 - 36.9). Participants from national hospitals were three times more likely to have positive beliefs than those attending regional hospitals (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1 - 5.1). Conclusion: health-care level and caregivers´ education impact HU beliefs and use. Targeted interventions to address specific obstacles across different caregiver subgroups are essential to improve HU beliefs and usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.