ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Remote ischemic conditioning for safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage after aneurysm clipping, design, and protocol for an open-label, evaluator blinding randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Efficacy in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Parallel-group Trial
Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Safety, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Aneurysm Clipping: An Open-Label, Evaluator-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and rationale: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe cerebrovascular event with a high mortality and disability rate. Compared to interventional surgery, microsurgical clipping is more invasive and has a higher incidence of postoperative complications, including cerebral vasospasm and ischemic cerebral infarction. In recent years, a large number of basic experiments have proved that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has multiple pathways of neuroprotective effects, and many large-scale randomized controlled clinical trials have confirmed that remote ischemic conditioning applied to patients with ischemic stroke has the effect of improving prognosis. However, current research has only focused on demonstrating the safety of remote ischemic conditioning for patients with aSAH, and lacks high-level evidence for its effectiveness. Method: We design an open-label, evaluator blinding randomized controlled trial. This study focuses on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage occurring within 24 h after microsurgical clipping. All participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group and the control group at a 1:1 ratio ( Discussion: The study's aim is to explore the safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of RIC in aSAH patients after clipping surgery. It serves as a methodological and feasibility foundation for the later multicenter, double-blind REPAIR trial (NCT06711302), which aims to confirm efficacy in a larger population. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06819657?term=NCT06819657&rank=1, NCT06819657.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.