ArticlePhotoacoustics2025
Low frequency detection in clinical multispectral optoacoustic tomography.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Label-free streamlined photoacoustic image guidance facilitates NIR-II photoablation in models of melanoma lung metastases.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frequency response characterization of optoacoustic (photoacoustic) detectors is critical because the signals are broadband, and the center frequency relates to the absorber size. We were particularly interested in studying the sub-1 megahertz response, which enables imaging of low spatial frequencies associated with resolving organs up to centimeter size. State-of-the-art characterization methods fail to measure this kilohertz frequency response reliably, leading to an incomplete understanding of the largest structures captured in an optoacoustic image. Herein, we developed an experimental arrangement to identify the lowest measurable frequency of an optoacoustic detector. We observe that a common optoacoustic detector with a 3.4 megahertz center frequency and 72 % 3 dB bandwidth can capture signals as low as 75 kilohertz. Given insufficient characterization methods, we also investigate artifacts triggered by image reconstruction with an erroneous kilohertz frequency response. Collectively, our work discusses the impact of incorporating low frequencies on optoacoustic image fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.