Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41356753›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2025

Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Multi-System Implementation and Evaluation.

David E Arterburn, Robert Wellman, Anita Courcoulas, Jane Anau, Clarissa Hsu, Ali Tavakkoli, Gary S Fischer, Bestoun Ahmed, Joanna Eavey, Casey Luce and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

David E ArterburnKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5208-8492
Robert WellmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA.
Anita CourcoulasDepartment of Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Jane AnauKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0527-4556
Clarissa HsuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA.
Ali TavakkoliDivision of General and GI Surgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Gary S FischerDepartment of Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Bestoun AhmedDepartment of Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Joanna EaveyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA.
Casey LuceKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle Washington USA.
Neely WilliamsCommunity Partners' Network Nashville Tennessee USA.
Diana StilwellShared Decision Making Solutions Consultants Boston Massachusetts USA.
Kathleen PaulWashington Permanente Medical Group Seattle Washington USA.
Christopher R DaigleWashington Permanente Medical Group Seattle Washington USA.
Glyn ElwynDartmouth College The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice Hanover New Hampshire USA.
Kathleen M McTigueDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To enhance shared decision-making (SDM) about metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) through the systematic implementation and evaluation of SDM tools across two large healthcare systems. Methods: The project involved developing and integrating SDM tools into clinical workflows at two health systems and training clinicians to use two decision aids with eligible patients. Data were collected using patient surveys, electronic health record (EHR) data, and qualitative interviews with clinicians. The primary outcome was change in patient-reported measures of SDM using the collaboRATE items. Results: Decision aids were delivered to 1675 patients. Implementation was associated with an increase in referrals to MBS and the number of patients undergoing surgery at KPWA but not at UPMC. Baseline levels of SDM quality were high. Post-implementation collaboRATE scores decreased significantly, indicating a perceived decline in SDM quality, but not in two other SDM measures. Qualitative feedback highlighted the challenges and successes of integrating SDM tools into clinical practice. Conclusions: Implementation of SDM tools had mixed results across the sites. Implementation was associated with an increase in referrals and surgery at KPWA but not at UPMC. The perceived quality of SDM conversations also declined. Future efforts should focus on incorporating all weight management options, including medications and lifestyle interventions.

Indexed as

bariatric surgeryobesityshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID41356753
PMCPMC12680512

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.