ArticleObesity science & practice2025
Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Multi-System Implementation and Evaluation.
Article in Obesity science & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To enhance shared decision-making (SDM) about metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) through the systematic implementation and evaluation of SDM tools across two large healthcare systems. Methods: The project involved developing and integrating SDM tools into clinical workflows at two health systems and training clinicians to use two decision aids with eligible patients. Data were collected using patient surveys, electronic health record (EHR) data, and qualitative interviews with clinicians. The primary outcome was change in patient-reported measures of SDM using the collaboRATE items. Results: Decision aids were delivered to 1675 patients. Implementation was associated with an increase in referrals to MBS and the number of patients undergoing surgery at KPWA but not at UPMC. Baseline levels of SDM quality were high. Post-implementation collaboRATE scores decreased significantly, indicating a perceived decline in SDM quality, but not in two other SDM measures. Qualitative feedback highlighted the challenges and successes of integrating SDM tools into clinical practice. Conclusions: Implementation of SDM tools had mixed results across the sites. Implementation was associated with an increase in referrals and surgery at KPWA but not at UPMC. The perceived quality of SDM conversations also declined. Future efforts should focus on incorporating all weight management options, including medications and lifestyle interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.