ArticleObesity science & practice2025
Exploring Expert Perspectives on Self-Monitoring Feedback Personalization, Content, Modality and Frequency: A Delphi Study.
Article in Obesity science & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pilot of a Micro-Randomized Factorial Trial of Self-Monitoring Feedback in a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Participants in behavioral weight management programs are typically provided with weekly interventionist-crafted self-monitoring feedback; however, there is a lack of empirical evidence regarding optimal feedback construction. Methods: Using a Delphi method, experts ( Results: Experts' views on the modality (e.g., email, app notification) varied, and participant preference and practicality were noted as key considerations. Experts ranked 8 feedback components as most important: problem solving, goal setting prompts, calorie intake and physical activity goal attainment, diet tracking frequency, weight trajectory (since the last message and since the start of the program), and diet quality. More experts endorsed the "sandwich" approach (i.e., positive comments along with strategies for change) for those experiencing weight loss challenges (95%) than for those experiencing weight loss success (55%). Overall, 82% noted that personalized feedback was important, but they were not always able to provide it due to time restrictions/personnel cost (75% identified these as key barriers). Conclusions: Although most experts viewed personalized self-monitoring feedback as important, time/cost considerations in crafting this feedback are critical. Future experimental studies should be used to evaluate the expert recommendations gathered from this Delphi study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.