Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41357142›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025

tUbeNet: a generalizable deep learning tool for 3D vessel segmentation.

Natalie A Holroyd, Zhongwang Li, Claire Walsh, Emmeline Brown, Rebecca J Shipley, Simon Walker-Samuel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie A HolroydCentre for Computational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9174-1346
Zhongwang LiCentre for Computational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom.
Claire WalshCentre for Computational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-3392
Emmeline BrownCentre for Computational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-0146
Rebecca J ShipleyCentre for Computational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-6228
Simon Walker-SamuelCentre for Computational Medicine, Division of Medicine, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3530-9166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has become an invaluable tool for bioimage analysis but, while open-source cell annotation software such as Cellpose is widely used, an equivalent tool for three-dimensional (3D) vascular annotation does not exist. With the vascular system being directly impacted by a broad range of diseases, there is significant medical interest in quantitative analysis for vascular imaging. We present a new deep learning model, coupled with a human-in-the-loop training approach, for segmentation of vasculature that is generalizable across tissues, modalities, scales, and pathologies. To create a generalizable model, a 3D convolutional neural network was trained using curated data from modalities including optical imaging, computational tomography, and photoacoustic imaging. Through this varied training set, the model was forced to learn common features of vessels' cross-modality and scale. Following this, the pre-trained 'foundation' model was fine-tuned to different applications with a minimal amount of manually labelled ground truth data. It was found that the foundation model could be specialized to a new datasets using as little as 0.3% of the volume of said dataset for fine-tuning. The fine-tuned model was able to segment 3D vasculature with a high level of accuracy (DICE coefficient between 0.81 and 0.98) across a range of applications. These results show a general model trained on a highly varied data catalogue can be specialized to new applications with minimal human input. This model and training approach enables users to produce accurate segmentations of 3D vascular networks without the need to label large amounts of training data.

Indexed as

deep learningsegmentationvasculature

Identifiers

PMID41357142
PMCPMC12679403

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.